RifleGear

Blogging randomly from the hip.

Hello Kitty AR-15 - evil black rifle meets cute and cuddly

NOTE: "Hello Kitty" is a trademark of Sanrio, Inc.  This firearm was built as a parody of the California Assault Weapon ban and this blog posting is for educational purposes and to draw attention to "Assault Weapon" gun laws and to encourage debate on such.  This gun is not for sale, nor is any replica or copy of it available for sale on this site. All images are protected under fair use doctrine.

So called "Assault Weapons Bans" such as the now expired 1994 Clinton ban and the one still in place in states such as California seek to ban rifles that our misguided legislators feel have no purpose in civilian hands.  They identify "evil features" they can use to generically classify these "military style" weapons in sweeping terms.  Of course these features, such as plastic pistol grips, barrel shrouds, and bayonet lugs have absolutely nothing to do with the firearms potential lethality in the real world and are merely cosmetic features.  After all, it really doesn't matter what color the firearm is if it fires the same ammunition right?  Well, in the "spirit" of the California Assault Weapon Ban I decided to do my best to alleviate the fears of my fellow citizens and gun-banning legislators when I put together a new AR-15 for my wife.  Below is the result of my painstaking work to transform an Evil Black Rifle (EBR) into a Cute Pink RIfle (CPR).  Introducing the Hello Kitty AR-15!

Hello Kitty AR-15

This rifle is 100% legal in California because it is based on an "off-list" lower receiver made by Stag Arms and has no evil features at all, instead featuring a fixed stock instead of the evil collapsible stock, a muzzle brake in place of the vile flash-hider, and a MonsterMan Grip instead of the heinous and malicious plastic pistol grip. Update: The MonsterMan Grip has subsequently been replaced with a Magpul MOE pistol grip and the rifle has been converted into a "fixed magazine" rifle through the use of a Bullet Button. The C Products magazine looks like a 30 round magazine body but is permanently modified to only allow 10 rounds.

 It has come to my attention that a lot of people think this rifle is merely a photoshop job.  To convince the doubters here is a picture of the painted parts prior to assembly.

Hell Kitten Parts

Update 1/13/2008:  Well we finally got the Kitty rifle to the range.  Here are a couple pics of the wife shooting her new pink paper puncher.  Hopefully this will put to rest the chatter about this not being a "real" rifle.

 

Update 2/23/08:  Due to an overwhelming number of comments posted on this page,  it was taking an unacceptable amount of time to load.  To improve the performance, I have moved a majority of the comments to an archived list.  Don't worry, I haven't deleted any of them.  You can view the archived comments here.

Comments (96) -

  • Antti, Finland

    2/11/2008 5:58:56 AM |

    I've always wondered, where does one actually need an assault rifle? It's military grade weapon and a such has no use with civilians.

  • BB, Texas

    2/11/2008 9:23:03 AM |

    "Assault rifle" is a term coined by anti-gun lobbyists and liberals to encompass all firearms that *look* like military weapons.

    Nevermind the fact that full-auto firearms have been illegal in this country since 1934.

    Nevermind the fact that the US has a relatively low murder rate.

    Nevermind the fact that your villified "assault rifles" are used in less than 1% of crimes involving a firearm.

    Nevermind the fact that it is legal to repaint and refinish a legal firearm.

    I see where some of the liberals are coming from here, I really do.  When you are exposed to nothing but lies and distortion on a daily basis about firearms and let politically and emotionally charged term enter your vernacular about firearms, I expect to see the horror in your faces.  It's a shame that so many people can't be open-minded about such an important issue as The 2nd Amendment.

    My father taught me firearm safety from a young age and kept everything locked away until I took my first plinks at tin cans at 8 years old with a Daisy pellet gun.  For the doubters here and about, visit a local gun shop or shooting range and converse with the people there.  You'll find they are salt-of-the-earth folks and not the stereotypical revolutionary rednecks stockpiling for the People's Liberation Army invasion.

  • Antti, Finland

    2/11/2008 9:49:59 AM |

    I didn't mean any desrespect, since I've owned firearms for about two decades, mainly for hunting purposes. I just wondered isn't there better options than an assault rifles (M16 is an assault rifle even if it shoots only semi-automatic) etc. for sport/hunting purposes.


  • angela

    2/11/2008 10:53:39 AM |

    i want to buy one
    how can i buy one?

  • David

    2/11/2008 11:19:21 AM |

    Antii,

    I think you are missing an important distiction, the AR-15 does NOT have an option for full auto so in that regard it is nothing like the M16/M4, etc... that the military uses - other than appearances.  You say you like to hunt, good for you, but why is your choice of firearm acceptable but mine is not?  You kill animals with yours, I shoot paper targets with mine and could use it in a self defense situation at some point.  How is one more or less desirable than the other?  Isn't it an erosion of our freedoms to let a group of people (the gov't, incfluenced by an anti-gun lobby) to decide what we as law-abiding citizens can lawfully own?  Answer me this - what is it about a AR-15 that makes it more or less desirable than a Ruger mini-14?  They both function the same and shoot the same ammo.  I assume since you say you like to hunt that you are pro-gun.  Why divide groups of gun owners in such a way that allows the antis to divide us and slowly erode our rights?  It's a slippery slope and before you know it THEY are deciding that the only thing we can own are airsoft rifles.  No thanks.

  • rushmore

    2/11/2008 6:48:11 PM |

    'All you anti-gun whiners and cry babies, please get your facts straight and try not to lie every other sentence when you talk about guns and especially "assault rifles".'

    Wow, you guys really ARE from the States.

    In other news, I think a tetris gun is good too!

  • Antti, Finland

    2/11/2008 11:12:40 PM |

    David,

    I didn't mean that its not acceptable, I was just wondering where do one actually need a semi-automatic assault rifle like weapon. Guns are guns, no matter how they work nad look like.

  • Bob

    2/12/2008 8:11:56 AM |

    Antti in Finland
    Understand it is not an ASSAULT rifle, under California law it is nothing more then a semi-automatic rifle (check out www.calguns.com). Be it for hunting or for target shooting. If you where from the United States and understood what our consitution stands for, you would understand the meaning of the "RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS".  Once again people who are not educated such as you in proper firearm identification causes us gun owners to defend ourselves and most inportant our RIGHTS. Why David has to continue to defend himself over and over is proof that there are people out there that have no idea what they are talking about.
    David great job, keep up the good work and stop feeling like you have to respond and defend yourself to all the
    un-educated / un-informed people of the world.

  • Nathalie Sicard

    2/12/2008 11:01:02 AM |

    Yeah, it doesn't look legit at all. But its such an awesome idea for a HK appearance. Wish Sanrio made a legit one. I'd buy it no second thought :]

  • Peki

    2/12/2008 11:44:08 AM |

    Nice work, that thing looks completely surreal. I was staring at the gun parts and thinking that somehow this has to be photoshopped... Smile

    I'm also from Finland where we have fairly strict gun laws. You're allowed to own them, if you're a member of hunting or shooting society. (Antti can correct me if I'm wrong.) I would never get a gun, but shooting is quite fun. I guess I'm for the strict gun laws, but not for total ban.

    Finland had a school shooting some time ago. Disturbed young man shot 8 people and himself. I'm not trying to argue that the outcome would have been different if the victims have had guns. Most likely not. But the press went apeshit about the fact that the said young man was able to easily get a .22 handgun. Some politicians followed, perhaps to score some easy points. The absurdity in this all is that the homicidal maniac was both determined and intelligent. He had just hopped through the right loops. You can't prevent that kind of person from killing his fellow humans by preventing legal gun sales.

    BTW: if you want to make an impact, listen to what Oldbrass says. Several pro-gun commenters are simply abusive, and end up sounding like teenagers.

  • Peki

    2/12/2008 12:09:01 PM |

    By "intelligent" above I'm just trying to say that the guy seemed functional enough to get the required paperwork filled, keep his mouth shut, etc. His "manifesto" is weird piece of crap. From "there's a problem in the world" he gets to "I'm the only smart person, even superhuman", continuing to "that's why I have to make a political statement by shooting some of my shoolmates".

  • Bren

    2/12/2008 8:42:15 PM |

    Nice work on the rifle David, maybe I'll do something like it on the next rifle I build.  I know that the gun laws in California are very disapointing to enthusiasts and gun collecters, but its no use argueing with ignorant people about it.   There will always be people who acknowledge that guns are not toys and respect guns and know how to use them safely, and there will always be anti-gun people un-educated  about guns and gun crime statistics..  The fact is not all of us can just move away from California to own the guns we want so we will have to continue to support gun rights advocates such as the NRA and other organizations.  By the way you have a great business and great customer service keep up the good work!

  • Annon

    2/13/2008 6:11:17 AM |

    no te la mames!!! JAJAJAJA

  • Hank Hill

    2/13/2008 6:49:02 AM |

    Where can we find the Hello Kitty w/ AR-15 graphic? Awesome!

  • twonine3

    2/13/2008 3:58:29 PM |

    We're doomed.Fuck this damn world.

  • A Friend

    2/13/2008 5:17:36 PM |

    Just letting the person who runs this site know, while you were attempting to get good views of guns from people this is being taken the wrong way by the law enforcement community.

    I work in the law enforcement field in California. Just today I got a email with pictures of your gun warning the Officers in my district to be on the look out for guns that look like yours in criminals hands.

    I just happened to come across your site while researching buying a new gun, and just wanted to let you know. While your working to make guns more acceptable, they will be trying to make it look like your doing something bad sadly!

    There is a reason that the right to own a gun is the 2nd amendment, and thats because without it the first amendment is worthless as well as the ones that follow it!

  • David

    2/13/2008 5:36:00 PM |

    @steve
    That is awesome!  Welcome to the Hello Kitty revolution.  If you don't mind, I will post one of those pictures up top.

    @A Friend
    Yes, I was recently made aware that a similar notice was circulating around the Gainesville, FL PD.  From what I understand, it came from New York - I am assuming Mayor Bloombergs office as he has already passed anti gun-paint legislation in New York City in 2006.  Do me a favor, please forward me that email as I am trying to track down the source so I can issue a cease and desist.  How ridiculous is it that they are singling out this one rifle, which is owned by a law abiding citizen with excellent gun safety, and warning about it being in the hands of "criminals".  You can reach me through the "contacts" link at the top of the page.  I promise you will remain anonymous.

  • Niceness

    2/14/2008 2:02:10 PM |

    Very cool gun! Laughing I like very very much... hmm... maybe i should mod a gun with tigger on it for my girl friend too Smile

    Politically speaking, i'm a.... i have no idea. I believe in the 2nd amendment whole-heartedly, but i still dont trust the government. I believe that is excatly why the founding fathers included the second amendment, so that the people can defend themselves. Not from foreign invaders (seriously, who in their right mind would try to invade the US... crossing oceans while the US holdes the best/largest navy?), but from the government itself. Originally, as british colonies, the US gained independence from the British empire, and learned that lesson.

    Politicians all have their personal agendas, and the Government is only a collection of politicians, so i wouldn't trust them any more than any single politician... i dont quite understand why some people feel that speaking out against the actions of the government is bad, as this was excatly what the founding fathers did against their government (the british). Political party affiliantion should only guide your decision so far, the rest, you as individuals should think about.

  • Ripstop

    2/15/2008 9:44:22 PM |

    Nice work Dave. I approve completely. Your artform is making it's way around the world as I am sure you know.

    One thing I must comment on is the same old, same old from all of the anti firearm people out there. Basically all they are saying is 'Stop it! You're scaring me!!!' They offer no facts or information to support their point of view. Purely emotional pap that comes to the foreground again and again. It is so tiresome.

    You make a *mockery out of them and they don't even realize. Kudos!

    To those that do not realize, the AR-15 was developed originally as a semi-automatic (self loading) SPORTING firearm that the U.S. government contracted to rework and develop into the military M-16 rifle. the ARmalite 15 rifle is not (and will never be) an assault rife.

    *To those too dense to understand. Stripped of the evil features and painted pink - See! It's not an evil firearm. The function of this rifle is exactly the same as the original platform. Handled correctly and safely, it is no more dangerous than any other firearm yet the comments on how scared they are because it looks so innocent is astounding. Purely emotion driven thinking.

  • Laurie Fernandez

    2/16/2008 2:51:05 AM |

    I recently got engaged. I am putting this bad boy on my gift registry. That or my fiance had better figure out how to  make one! I love it!

  • Sabrina Naumann alias pinkfatlou

    2/17/2008 11:28:57 PM |

    Hey You!

    I saw the Kello Kitty AR-15 at first in the RUGGED Magazine (ISSUE #14, Spring 2008). And im very amazed about this nice weapon. It looks really great and i wanna buy it when its in the Shop.
    I heard that some bloke in California made thus for his wife. Isn`t it a sweet liveshown???

    If you know more about the story, please tell me at my E-mail account.

    Bye bye,

    Sabrina alias pinkfatloui

  • Granny Leah

    2/18/2008 9:18:02 AM |

    Hi, I'm a Democrat. I have ladybugs crawling up and down my pistol. L*O*V*E the Hello Kitty gun...

    Duracoat, huh? Does it need to be used in a spraygun? Got a new coach gun yesterday...

  • Joe

    2/19/2008 1:41:33 PM |

    Good grief. If there were no other weapons available human beings would kill each other with sticks and rocks. Gun control does not end violence, change behavior or eliminate criminal intent. Responsible ownership of a gun, however, does.

  • Kokopelli

    2/19/2008 1:54:19 PM |

    I was at my local sherriff's office (in east TN).  I noticed they had a picture of this exact rifle with a bulletin warning that gang members are using hello kitty AR-15's.  Seriously.  Well, law enforcement means well, I'll give them that...  


    Anyway, It's good to see someone did this just for the novelty of it.  The rifle is awesome.  Two pink fuzzy mitten covered thumbs up.

      

  • David

    2/19/2008 4:02:02 PM |

    Kokopelli,

    Since when does a law enforecment agency telling blatant lies indicate that they "mean well".  There are only two of these rifles in existence that I am aware of.  Mine and the one Steve-O made.  Last I checked neither of us are "gang members".  I am still hoping somebody will send me a copy of that notice as I want to know the source of it.  

  • Victor

    2/20/2008 2:05:42 AM |

    Just do humanity a favour and shoot yourself with when standing in a fire.

  • Darteis

    2/20/2008 5:04:54 AM |

    That thing is discustingly ugly. Problem is any three year old kid wouldn't think of it as anything else but a toy unless you teach them that the cute and fun toy in question can kill people and three year old can be tough to teach. All we need is one child shooting someone with a rifle painted like that to pass a law banning such painting. Rid the world of hello kitty!

  • Judy

    2/20/2008 7:12:47 AM |

    Firstly, somehow I'm not surprised to see Leslie Fish posting here. (wait, wait,... OMG, she DOES exist!)
    Gotta warn the original poster that this is most definitely song fodder.  Be afraid.  Be VERY afraid...

    Secondly, this guy uses a theme as revolting as Hello Kitty and then has the nerve to give this thing to his wife?!!  He'll start believing in stricter gun control laws real soon, when he finds out how well she can control hers... Hope he has body armor he can wear to bed...

  • Fig

    2/20/2008 1:27:06 PM |

    man you guys are stirring the pot!

    btw David,

    love the theme of that AR-15! Of course leave it to the news to run with it for something else!

  • David

    2/20/2008 2:39:04 PM |

    Yeah, we are all over that video on the forums.  It's amazing, really.  All I did was paint a cute rifle for my wife to use and to join me at the range.  I put a few pictures of it on the internet and it has taken on a life of it's own.  I can't control the irrational fear so many people have of it and the manufactured "threat" that it supposedly presents to law enforcement.  One thing is for sure, it definitely sparks strong emotions in people - like those from the people that posted above about loaded weapons lying around for children to play with - or the fellow that hopes I kill myself because he doesn't like the fact that I legally own a firearm he finds offensive.  Nice

    To all of you that "get it", I say thanks for all the positive comments.

  • Tam

    2/20/2008 2:44:06 PM |

    I love it!  Where can we buy one?

  • Andrzej

    2/20/2008 3:49:28 PM |

    To the guys moaning about kids being drawn to cute looking guns: DON'T LEAVE YOUR GUNS LYING WHERE A KID CAN REACH, MORONS! Regardless of the colour any gun must be securely locked if not currently used/carried by the owner. It applies even to airguns, paintball guns and nailguns, for heaven sake... All potentially dangerous tool must be kept OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN!

    To the gun's 'creator': cute gun ;) And don't worry about critics - they are just stupid and devoid of any sense of humour. AND don't complain about gun-restricting laws in your jurisdiction too much ;) Where I live an average private citizen is very unlikely to be allowed to buy a normal gun for self-defense (well, there's a loop-hole that allows people to own a blackpowder guns made before 1850, or replicas of those - and you don't even have to get e permit or register it anywhere! which is quite silly IMHO). And semi-automatic rifles to shoot on a range for fun? Forget it!

  • Sifu

    2/20/2008 5:28:08 PM |

    Very creative! The world needs more wise ones who can make such an ingenious satirical statement. Proof is all the illiterate asswipes with the knee-jerk reactions on both sides. Yes, we need to be able to own weapons (we're presumably all adults here, and we all know we didn't get this country in a slap fight). But in most cases in the real world, turning an insult into the OK Corral isn't a good idea, either. So let's teach our young to respect firearms, not make them into enticing forbidden fruit. It's much healthier for a kid to spend a day plinking at cans than an hour playing a violent video game in a gun-free house. Kung Fu Master say: Take yourself not so seriously, Grasshopper. That way you avoid premature stress-related heart attack. And if you're SERIOUS about defending yourself, hoist your flabby tail up off the couch and take a martial arts class. Nobody was ever accidentally killed while cleaning their chi. No need for concealed weapons permit, no fumbling to rack a slide in the dark, no chafing from an ill-fitting concealment holster, and who knows - the resulting enhanced health, balance, and coordination you develop may actually improve your marksmanship.

  • Candy Girl

    2/20/2008 6:05:57 PM |

    NOW YOU HAVE MY INTEREST. This is what I'm talking about. I have always advocated that urban warriors should look like innocent children. ( but not actually be children of course ) I have always liked the idea of women dressed like the Anime characters: in short to the butt dresses, lots of cleavage showing, sporting long pony tails, and carring a GUN LIKE THIS ONE.
    Lets send those uptight, women hating, turban headed, perverse Koran spewing, bearded morons from the middle east a message. ALL of our women should be issued one of these HELLO KITTY  AR-15's, and taught how to use it.
    I want a SAILOR MOON army of HELLO KITTY AR-15 armed females here in the USA. A PINK ARMY! JUST IMAGINE IT....
    If that wouldn't cause those ignorant GiHadists to self destruct, I don't know what would...

    I got to get me one of these AR-15's....I LOVE IT!

  • Granny Leah

    2/20/2008 9:49:24 PM |

    Candy girl, you forgot to mention using lard to grease the guns... heh, heh

    I've seen DuraCoat in the craft aisle, would that be the same paint? It doesn't need an airbrush.

  • Victor

    2/21/2008 2:07:59 AM |

    Hello kitty is just plain ugly, please paint it black again.

  • SGT Jones US ARMY

    2/21/2008 5:45:48 AM |

    ok candy girl, see its all the dumbass people like you that have no idea whats going on in the world and actualy believe what you see on the fucking tv that are making the war even harder for us soldiers. why dont you learn the facts before you start talking shit about other people even if we are at war in there country

  • Jamie

    2/21/2008 8:17:34 PM |

    I love it. Where can I get one?

  • Andy

    2/22/2008 11:07:51 AM |

    While I was watching the CNN clip, I noticed they showed a 1911 pistol and it was labeled, "GLOCK, REAL".

    Yep, it MUST be truthful!!! fter all, it was on CNN!!!!!!!

  • tom

    2/22/2008 3:21:22 PM |

    Maybe we should give these guns to the Iraqi children US terrorists are terrorizing - perhaps Iraqi children will remove the 200 000 foreign fighter yankee terrorists. Ditto for Afghanistan - a bloody pity that Rawa has a pacifist strain - otherwise they could use such weapons to drive out the yankee terrorists with their jehadi (northern alliance, in Terroristia) allies. Of course, they would have to be automatic, but fortunately, both countries are rich in machine shops and gun culture.

  • joe

    2/22/2008 5:04:25 PM |

    Everybody here thats anti-gun stated in this blog has obviously never lived in a poor urban neighborhood and dont have a choice to go anywhere else (they live in the rich part of town to hide from reality surrounded by bodyguards). The people who suffer from gun control are the law-abiding citizens who live in poor urban neighborhoods and cant defend themselves (yes they do exist)...when something bad happens all the police do is come out make a report and leave ....if they do show up at all...washington d.c....chicago....new york city to name a few...yes TOM you ****ing moron were in iraq (the world trade center...remember dumb***).....I`d like you to say what you typed  to one of our soldiers faces if you got the balls....and I`d enjoy watching him or her beat the **** out of you ...or better yet..... say that to one of the survivors of the world trade center....and watch that person rip you a new ***hole!!!!!  when some **** happens in the rich part of town...we`ll see who will preach anti gun then...god bless our troops

  • Gun~chik

    2/22/2008 5:17:30 PM |

    WOW, there is so much conflict involved in this topic. Nobody ever wants to budge or even admit they see some truth in other side. Stubborn. This gun is not intended to go on the market at toys-r-us, or to conceal the fact that it is deadly. I have been around guns since I was a kid and was taught proper use and safety from the time I picked up my first bb gun. I really believe that education is the key to gun safety. I think this idea was awesome. I would love to take one of my guns and personalize it somehow!

  • tom

    2/22/2008 5:18:31 PM |

    Joe, 1st off, no Iraqis involved in trade center attacks, so cry me a river. As for your old buddies, now enemies the students (taleban), the immediate state of your relationship to them is of little concern to me and likewise to Afghans; if you want to fight them, I'll give both of you guns and you can battle it out in a building, mano-a-mano; you yanky creeps supported the muj/jehadis, and then you moan that you suffer a pitiful fraction of the fatalities that you inflicted on Afghans earlier? Shame.

    Perhaps you are right about Iraq: Precisely because Iraqis are innocent of the 911 attacks, they deserve to die. If you let investor-terrorists live, you don't deserve to.

    US invasion of South Vietnam: 1000 911s, though against a smaller population. And as for you survivors of the attacks, we already have an overpopulation of investor-terrorists in southern Africa, and some 'ethnic cleansing' (i.e. what you terrorists are doing in eastern Congo-Kinshasha against the Hutu so that you can have your bloody tantulum capacitors - 5 million victims so far at minimum) may be required, though it was good to see the terrorists attacked in one of their nests.

  • Gun~chik

    2/22/2008 5:25:05 PM |

    Tom, I have to ask; where are you from??

  • tom

    2/22/2008 5:28:53 PM |

    I'm from southern Africa, and was (in an unplanned way) a victim of the US-sponsored apartheid regime terrorism in Angola/Namibia/Mozambique (not to compare myself with the direct victims; their fates were far worse).

  • Gun~chik

    2/22/2008 5:38:06 PM |

    I see. I must say, after talking to a few people at the college I attend who are from Africa, some who were child soldiers, there is a lot that goes on that we don't know about. Our government has this annoying tendancy to keep us selectively ignorant to what  goes on with our military.

  • Gun~chik

    2/22/2008 5:49:39 PM |

    A comment for David. Just to bring this blog back to the gun topic: I think that this gun is such an original idea. Can't say that I am a hello kitty fan, but the fact that you did it for your wife is awesome. You have definitely sparked quite a debate, but these days just saying the word "gun" is enough to bring people to an uproar. I commend you for defending your rights, and think you present some very good arguments. It is not about making the gun more appealing, or to appear less dangerous, it was just a way to personalize it for your wife. Excellent work.

  • tom

    2/22/2008 5:50:33 PM |

    Gun~chik: You and I are both using computers; open them up and you'll see little yellow (typical) blobs; these are tantulum capacitors; you'll also find them in cell-phones etc. They are made from a mineral called coltan. The UN is primarily involved in the violence necessary for profitable extraction (from eastern Congo-Kinshasha, Zaire to white-supremacists); for all the ranting and raving against foreign occupation or government control that one finds on such discussion sites (though in fairness not the former thus far here), you north americans (canadians included, as that genocidal terrorist Romeo Dallaire was much involved in terrorism against Hutus in neighbouring Burundi & Rwanda, his claims otherwise notwithstanding, and may even have caused the genocide against Tutsis) are quite comfortable with your government and/or external agencies (UN, AU etc) committing atrocities elsewhere for perks like cell-phones and computers.

    The child-soldiers were likely either from Uganda (east-central) or Sierra-Leone; please google Wainaina's 'How to write about Africa' - his distaste for weapons not withstanding.

  • Gun~chik

    2/22/2008 6:04:48 PM |

    Tom: You can't say comfortable. Ignorant-absolutely! It's not like our government posts national bulletins telling us of the atrocities they are going to commit for our "perks". Whatever goes on outside of this country, they don't let us in on for a reason. The big guys making the profit are the ones comfortable with violence in exchange for commodities; Not us lowly citizens sitting on our computers with no idea where the parts even came from.

  • Candy Girl

    2/22/2008 6:04:54 PM |

    The notion of dressing women in any fashion, especially Sailor Moon, is a JOKE! COME ON! Did you think I was serious?
    An All Female Pink Army? come on? get real....my whole comment was tongue in cheek....I guess some people can't take a joke very well.  Don't you think that the HELLO KITTY AR 15 is a social commentary about the stupid conditions we find ourselves in now? It too, is tongue in cheek, and a thumbing of the nose at the idiotic laws that are being passed....
    "Evil Black meets Cute and Cuddly!" what do you suppose the meaning of that is?
    And for the record,SGT JONES...I WAS in the military; 1967-1971 USAF. Pacific Arena,  ANG 1983-1993. USCG 1993-1996..THREE Honorable Discharges, final rank of E-7.  So, next time you want to spout off, condeming some you do not know, you better get your head out of your ass, and know what the hell your talking about. GOT THAT! Plus I have marksmanship ribbons for long gun, hand guns, and shotgun. I was qualified for 50 cal. marine machine gun as well.( Barely, I have to admit )
    I own the following weapons; two AK-47's, two SKS's, Mosin Nagant w/sniper set up, 12 ga. tactical shotgun, 20 ga. tactical shotgun/stainless model, A Henry 44 cal. rifle, 12 ga, Remington 870 pump, 22 rolling block rifle, 22 Winchester rifle w/ zoom scope, 32 cal revolver, 38 cal revolver, 9mm semi auto handgun, plus a M1 Springfield bolt action, and a Grarand that belonged to my father...
    I know how to shoot, and I am acurate from 50-500 yds.  So take your sarcastic remarks, and stuff `em where the sun doesn't shine SGT,JONES... I did my duty, I know what it like to be in the military, and I remain a patriot...
    Lighten up, and know when someone is yanking your chain....you guys will have to figure out when I am, and when I am not!
    I am a raving banshee bitch if you want to take me on...so watch it!

  • Gun~chik

    2/22/2008 6:18:50 PM |

    Tom: Just read Wainaina's article. I definitely get your point there.

    Candy Girl: your sign on name is a definite indicator of your sense of humor = )

  • tom

    2/22/2008 6:25:24 PM |

    Gun~chik: Thank you. It was good talking.

  • Army Wife

    2/23/2008 5:08:16 PM |

    http://youtube.com/watch?v=X9cDbA8O9-c

    ^A video showing why there is no clear distinction when it comes to calling something an "assault weapon"

    And am I the only one who noticed that the bolt carrier wasn't pictured in the photograph?  
    You can paint that stock and receiver anything you like, but without a carrier its just a dud.

  • David

    2/23/2008 5:11:17 PM |

    Thats a great video, too bad most non-gun people still don't get it.  Pistol grip = Evil military weapon...  No, you are not the only one to notice the bolt-carrier and bolt is missing in the picture (the gas tube, hammer, springs, and a lot of other lower parts are also missing).  I didn't paint those parts and only the painted parts are included in the "exploded" view photo.  Do you notice the bolt carrier is present in the picture of it at the range?  Trust me, this rifle goes "bang" when you pull the trigger.

  • Sean

    2/23/2008 6:23:30 PM |

    this is hilarious! im actually a liberal, and i really could care less about these things. im not afraid of "assault rifles". pistols are the problems in the cities. a law abiding citizen should be able to own and operate a gun, but i think we need a better crackdown to prevent the baddies from getting them. i dont know how we can do that but i think it can be done.

    Some people in the liberal party are just, ya know, crazy! Smile

  • Victor

    2/23/2008 9:24:17 PM |

    Tom, First off you are a fucking cowardly cunt. And I mean that with all the disrespect in the world to you and to anyone that wishes harm to any service man fighting for his/her country or what they believe in. I am very offended by your statement seeing as i have many close friends and acquaintances from high school fighting in Iraq and the stan. I can assure you that none of them want to be there, after all its not the grunt that makes the decision to go to war, its the politician. secondly you are a piece of shit, I have more respect for the insurgents in Iraq that are killing American soldiers because at least they have the balls to die for what they believe in; however you sir are an armchair strategist coward. I dont agree with everything my country does but im glad i dont run into subhuman scum like you very often at all, and thats saying alot, I attend UC Santa Cruz and this is Where all those Bay Area/ San Francisco kids come to school. I am not from the bay area, Im from LA and I live in an inner city neighborhood. trust me banning guns or placing strict regulations on them wont keep them in the hands of  those who intend to use them for malicious purposes all that will do is make it more difficult for the law abiding citizen to own a firearm with which they can defend themselves with if that is the case. People in places more affluent areas dont seem to understand that you cant always wait for police to show after 911 is called the fact of the matter is, as someone stated before is that they dont show up and if they do, all they can do is file a report- considering nobody is hurt or killed. I have known how to operate firearms for as long as I can remember. at the age of 4 my father bought me a bolt action winchester .22 caliber rifle that I have carried with me everytime i went hunting with him. There have always been guns in my home and with two younger brothers and many kid cousins we have never had an issue with firearm safety because we take the time to teach them what guns are and what they do. I ran into this site while doing a search for instructions on how to build a competition ar 15 and was just angered at some of the things I saw. I beleive in free speech like everyone else but I recognize that it comes at a price. The second amendment exists for a reason- to keep the rest of our other amendments from being infringed upon. Once guns are banned what else is next- sharp, pointy knives? where do we draw the line, and how many of our freedoms are we willing to give up in order to have this false sense of security.


    p.s. things and gangsters don't use assault rifles- they use handguns and they never paint them, it takes too much time, nor do they obtain them through legal means. Nor can they shoot which is why innocent people die. we should all train these thugs to kill each other and not innocent bystanders

    p.p.s. does anyone have any sort of advice on where i can get some literature on how to build a tactical AR style Carbine?

  • Victor

    2/23/2008 9:27:25 PM |

    oh almost forgot- mad props on that Rifle, but wouldnt the white sights and barrel create some glare when sighting a target
    and once again fuck you Tom

  • David

    2/23/2008 9:53:34 PM |

    Victor,

    I should take some more pics.  The actual front sight post and rear sight aperture are not painted, still black.  

    Building a tactical AR carbine is not hard at all.  Check my site at www.riflegear.com for my contact information and I can point you at all the information you need.  You can also check this URL for a brief overview of how to build one, but with links to more detail: blog.riflegear.com/.../...--legal-ar-15-rifle.aspx

  • L

    2/24/2008 6:56:54 AM |

    WOW I WANT ONE!!!! LUCKY WIFE!

  • tom

    2/24/2008 8:21:41 AM |

    Victor: I've been a direct victim of servicemen enough, thank you. I was a tad young at the time, but some good folks from where I grew up assisted the removal of yanky terrorists from Somalia, '93. (Call it pan-Africanism... Then again, I guess you blame it all on your beloved bogeyman, Farah Aidid - ROTFL. So much for Muslim/Christian antagonism as well.) Lets see you scoundrels mess up a humanitarian aid project so that you can have access to 2/3 of somalia's land for oil again - wait a minute, that's what you are doing right now with those ethiopian warlords.

    Hence my suggestion that other victims of your servicemen be armed. It is odd that you should fantasize me an opponent of gun rights; Freudian slip? You want me to worship your soldiers. Sure. Just as soon as they stop murdering, raping, stealing and so on. At least in WWI, your soldiers had the decency to ignore orders, and run to the other side's trenches for a beer, though that was with whites, and we haven't forgotten your crimes in the Philippines shortly before that.

    In any case, it would be good to see your victims dispatch you with those nice, pink guns, though Hello Kitty is too popular in Singapore to be legit for a gun - in S'pore, punishment for possession of a gun is automatic death penalty.

  • David

    2/24/2008 8:34:25 AM |

    Ok, Tom you are done here.  It's obvious you are just an America-hater and your posts so far have had nothing to do with the topic of this gun.  I try not to censor the posts - I have only deleted a couple posts that were nothing but profanity-laced rants that added nothing to the discussion, but you Tom are starting to get on my nerves with all your America-hating anti-military rants.  Goodbye.

  • Trey

    2/24/2008 1:03:11 PM |

    Yes, very funny stuff! BTW, full-auto is not illegal...you just have to license it properly. Yes, the anti-gun folks out there should look at banning cars and physicians too. They kill far more people than guns in the U.S. True, but all joking aside. Do MOST criminals get their guns legally from a licensed gun dealer? So, let's speculate...all guns are banned. Does that mean criminals will not get guns anymore? What do you all think? Look at the rapidly increasing violent crime stats in Australia and England, for example. Unless multiple police officers are posted at each block of our cities, can we expect the police to keep us from serious injury or death? Not going to happen.

    And, for you folks outside the U.S., why do you not wish to have semi-auto rifles (and handguns)? They are great for fun and self-defense! Do you not trust yourselves, or do you live in fear that some criminal might legally get one and shoot you? Besides, why do the wealthy politicians (most who own many guns) get to have them and the civilians not?

    ;)

  • Jeff

    2/24/2008 4:09:15 PM |

    The US has a relatively low murder rate compared to what?

    That's a very vague and misleading statement.

    What about % of firearms related homicides? I'm willing to bet that 'comparatively' it's extremely high.

  • David

    2/24/2008 5:06:43 PM |

    Jeff,

    I'm not sure specifically which post you are referring to but there are some great crime statistics available at http://www.nationmaster.com/cat/cri-crime

    According to that site, 39% of homicides in the US are committed with firearms.  I agree that is a lot, but the US is #7 on the list for that stat - Thialand is #1 at 79%, South Africa is #2 at 59%.

    If you look at the overall murders in the world, the US is #24, while some countries with very strict limits on civilan gun ownership (or totally banned outright) have much higher murder rates.  Take a look at Jamaica at #1, Russia at #5, or Mexico at #6.  Apparently banning guns does not stop murder in those countries.  I guess it's time to ban knives there too?  What about baseball bats?  Don't expect to find direct correlations between gun bans and murder rates - you can't.  But you CAN expect to find an increase in violence and crime in countries where you ban gun ownership from law-abiding citizens.

  • Get a life!

    2/25/2008 8:36:40 AM |

    Some of these clueless victims of society need to worry about their real problems in their life. Not the color of mine or your rifle. I know for a fact if someone was holding you and your family at gun point then you would want the hello kitty rifle to scratch out there eyes with. Get a life and grow up. Face your own problems, because your number one problem is not being able to defend yourself when the time comes. Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my gun the last time I checked, maybe that’s something you socialist should check on. Let me guess you are either voting for Hitlerly or Osama. Such a waste!

  • Bob

    2/25/2008 7:12:56 PM |

    Get a Life'
    EXCELLENT comments, on target and the truth. Voting for either Hillary or Obama is going to cost us our rights to bear arms.
    Ralph Nator will take some of the demo votes from both of them.


    McCain 08

  • robby

    2/25/2008 9:04:15 PM |

    The most dangerous thing in america today is obesity so get out and run you fat asses!

  • jocleyn

    2/26/2008 3:49:17 AM |

    lol SO funnyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!! i love it but it looks plastick but i seen her shooting with it at the top so... I BELIVE U  if any one wants to get tons of laughing in their day u can watch thease 3 vids that me and my friends laugh crazly! links http://www.newgrounds.com/attack of the evil tv2                                       you can also
    watch                           http://www.youtube.com/gay brbie song                                            you can also watch                           http://www.newgrounds.com/sheiks a girl?                  their o so funny!!!!!!!!! well cya gonna watchem


    ty and cya!


  • Ryan

    2/26/2008 10:39:48 PM |

    I for one do not agree with the banning of any weapon or required modification of such weapons to make them less deadly. But then again I do not think they should be painted to look like toys last thing we want is little Brittany getting interested in a gun because it has a beloved cartoon character on it.

    In fact the only 2 reasons I see to own a gun of such magnitude would be either defending you're home/business from a multitude of intruders or in the case a society has the need to rebel agenst a corrupted government.

  • matto

    2/27/2008 8:47:34 AM |

    Why does anyone NEED something like this?  No reason, absolutely none.  I don't "need" my truck, either.  People don't "need" fast cars, or fancy clothes, or expensive sun glasses.  Lets let the government ban EVERYTHING that we don't "need!"  Isn't communism AWESOME?

    If people WANT something that doesn't harm you in any way shape or form, what difference does it make?  I mean, I don't like when men use hair gel.  So you see me petitioning the government to ban hair gel??

  • Jacob

    2/27/2008 4:23:43 PM |

    That's awesome...seriously, that is so hardcore. If I ever go into the military, that's the gun I'm taking with me...like I'm going to find you and break in to your house and steal it from you. (just kidding) If that's the case, do you think the enimie soldiers would lower their guard because the gun is to manly for them?

    But not only that, but you gave it to your wife, smart move. I bet you got some "special" treatment that night. ^_^

  • California Den

    2/28/2008 1:40:19 PM |

    What's wrong with an American citizen being allowed to own any damn thing he wants so long as he (or she) isn't useing that thing to rob or harm other people?? If we start calling CLAW HAMMERS "claw ASSAULT hammers" will carpenters teh state over be instant criminals because some elected ofal (not a type O) decideds to convince his electorate that He is looking after the safty or their "children" by outlawing some THING rather that the conduct of those very few who miss use any THING to rob/ hurt others. As I understand it more people have been killed/injured by federaly mandated airbags than have been killed by crimiminals weilding "assault rifles".

    Yes Mary and Manny tree hugger it's true GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE!


    If we were seriouse about dealing with the criminal use of firearms in this nation we'd institute the death penalty on any and all who use deadly force or the threat of deadly force in the commision of a crime. If Johnny or Janie ner do well are willing to wave a gun at someone and demand that they Hand it over, then Johny or Janie ought to , after be convicted in a court of law, be marched straight from the trial room to a gas, leathal injection, or other execution area and be PUT DOWN. Give it three generations of real capital punishment which is swift and PUBLIC and I guaranty use of guns/ knives/ rocks in the commision of a crime will go down.

    Anyone who hears yet another story about a repeat offender who harms some innocent person and is not outraged IS THE PROBLEM.

    I want an autoknife like the Benchmade Infidel because they are beautiful examples of creative expression. I want a sig sg550 because they are beautiful precision examples of man's creativity and enginuity. If I turn around and missuse either of these I accept MY RESPONSIBILITY for doing so and expect to be PUT DOWN. However If I'm forced to kill the illeagal alien gangbanger who finlly broke into my house instead of the garage again, I want a medal because for all you know I just saved my own life and that of your sainted mother who now lives alone on a fixed income.

    sorry  ratyher ranty this...  But I'm sure many of you share my frustration with all this debate that really boils down to " there are people out there willing to limit our ability to defend ourselves and others"

  • Mike

    2/28/2008 5:54:49 PM |

    I have to say that this blog has considerably enlightened me in regards to both sides of the gun debate. The gun is great, and it's awesome to see that California hasn't been completely transformed into Teletubbieland. Keep up the good work!

  • Baltar

    2/28/2008 11:29:11 PM |

    Guns arnt Toys, you make me sick

  • Matt

    2/29/2008 5:57:50 AM |

    Baltar: "Guns arnt Toys, you make me sick"

    You're right, guns are not toys (for children, which I am assuming you imply) - they are weapons intended to kill - more precisely to protect, by means of severely disabling or killing. IMO if you're not willing to carry a gun and put your own life on the line to protect the people you love and care about, well, that's simply detestable. Then again, not everybody is fit for such a grave responsibility, and if you're not, please for the love of god, don't ever get a gun.  If you think there is any more effective way to protect yourself and your loved ones from the most heinous crimes - murder, torture, rape, etc. - *other* than responsibly using a dependable firearm, you're simply foolish.

    Likewise, despite it's appearance, this gun is still not a children's toy, but a mature adult's hobby and a work of art - and it looks fun - so deal with it.

    When you raise a child to be a young man or woman do you want them to have good values and be willing and able to put their own lives on the line to protect their loved ones when it becomes time? I will.

  • Jay Pruett

    2/29/2008 8:34:55 AM |

    I like the gun actually, I know that it could be a real problem with kids
    but just like any gun they all will kill!!! The person that buy's the gun
    should be responsible for it and anything that happens to it. All weapons
    could be in some since concediered a toy. Remembet that we have tje
    right to have guns for hunting and protection.
    Last question is does anyone know where I can get this rifle before the
    federal government bans it. Believe me boys and girls the federal gov is
    trying to get this product off the market.

    I am PRO THIS RIFLE

    JP

  • s-e-a-n s-t-r-o-m q tip

    2/29/2008 1:12:18 PM |

    i love the gun. how can i buy one.

  • s-e-a-n s-t-r-o-m q tip

    2/29/2008 1:13:16 PM |

    thats a funny gun

  • David

    2/29/2008 1:22:39 PM |

    JP,

    What is so interesting about a lot of the posts on this blog is how many people just respond from pure emotion.  THIS RIFLE IS NOT FOR SALE, as the licensing issues with Sanrio would prevent that.  This was a custom paint job that I had made for my wife, and yes it is kept locked up and out of the reach of children.  My kids would not be a problem anyway as they are tought proper gun safety and respect.  It's funny how many people's initial reaction is shocked horror about how terrible this is!  "Think about the children!".  Yes, Balter, I am talking about you and others.  Guns may not be toys but, then again, there are toy guns.  Try not to get upset about it, it's not worth getting sick over.  I'm sure there are quite a few more illegal handguns out on the street that you should be more worried about then this pink rifle my wife uses at the range and then locks up in our gun safe.  I'm sure most of those handguns are in basic blued steel, black, or stainless - that should ease your mind a bit.

    Anyway, back to banning.  There may actually be some local ordinances in your area that would prevent you from painting a gun like this.  Mayor Bloomberg or New York City actually passed a law in 2006 preventing the painting of guns any colors other than black, gray, silver, and possibly a couple other bland colors.  In California, it is illegal to paint a gun a color that is reserved for toy guns - namely bright green and orange.  Pink, however, is not on the list Smile

  • Rob

    3/1/2008 8:39:12 AM |

    Hi All,
    I keep seeing the word "Need" as if one ought to be able to have reasons e.g. "Sporting Purpose" for arms. Free men ought not be asked to justify activities that are considered natural rights. To wit, the whole issue with regard to "Sporting Purpose" and "Need" begs the question.
    Best,
    Rob

  • Jaon, Utah

    3/1/2008 2:01:13 PM |

    this is a response to Antti, Finland's entry

    the AR-15 in its original form was not a millitary grade weapon, it was originaly meant to be a compitition shooter, later adopted by the millitary (as the M16). So stop dissing my favorate gun. (i know this because i was in the millitary)
    the fact that somebody made one that is cute and cuddly is verry cool. espesialy in pink is very cool because i sell mary kay products.

  • nate

    3/1/2008 9:18:47 PM |

    i love the gun!  very creative.  is the paint durable?  i dont understand why people are upset about this gun.  looks fine to me.  great job!

  • Bruce

    3/1/2008 9:21:23 PM |

    David,

    Nice job, I think my wife wants one to (especially since I just bought an AR at a gunshow).

    I noticed that the safety switch is on the right side.  It this because you have the "Monster Man" grip installed?  

    Question for Steve-O, are you also in Kalifornia and are you using the "bullet-button" on yours (that's the route, I plan on using once I'm back in the people's republic.

  • Katie

    3/3/2008 3:22:47 PM |

    David- What kind of paint did you use? I love it! I'm a Hello Kitty Collector and my husband is a Military Man.  You did an awesome job! Thanks for posting the pics!! Let me know!! Thanks!

  • Krysta in Milwaukee

    3/3/2008 7:26:03 PM |

    This evening on the news the Powers That Be (Mayor & Police Chief) are all in a tizzy because some guns now are
    painted to look like toys, and some toys now look more like real guns.  

    I can understand the police point of view - if they're not sure, and hesitate, they could be killed; if they don't
    hesitate, they could kill someone with a toy.

    What brought me back here was seeing YOUR gun used as an example. Yes, that first picture up there, with the
    whole thing assembled, was used on several TV stations tonight. (Yes, along with several others, but I KNEW about
    yours and they completely screwed up the story behind it, missed the irony of it all.)

  • David

    3/3/2008 7:38:18 PM |

    Yeah, I've seen links to so many news storys that feature this rifle I don't even get upset about it any more.  You would think that with having received over 230,000 page views and being linked to from hundreds of sites that the jounalists writing and running these stories would think that maybe, just maybe they should contact me for a comment.  Nope, so far not one has asked for any comment from me.  I guess it doesn't fit into their agenda and, besides, why should they take the time to validate the anti-gun stories that keep getting handed to them by the police and the brady bunch?  The truth?  They aren't interested in that.

  • dizzle

    3/5/2008 8:21:07 PM |

    Wow!  Interesting comments here - good discussion.  Nice gun by the way - very stylish.  I really think some of the people here need to think about other peoples opinions and not discount them as "stupid".  I aim that comment for those who state that this gun is somehow evil or will lead to the death of children (are you serious?  Kids will grab anything that is dangerous whether it looks like hello kitty or not  so keep dangerous items away from them) and those who act as if there is some conspiracy by liberals (I am one by the way) to eradicate assault weapons for no particular reason.  There certainly is the argument that criminals don't necessarily purchase their guns legally (does anyone have actual data on that?) but how many students would have been killed at Virginia Tech if Seung-Hui Cho could have legally purchase (as he did the guns he used) a fully automatic assault riffle?  Don't get me wrong I have no problem with this gun or most rifles that are not fully automatic but to act as if there is no reason for SOME gun control simply doesn't make sense to me - although I at least see the other point of view that the 2nd amendment was designed to maintain the peoples ability to resist any attempt by the government to take control of our democracy by military force and as such would imply the right to access similar fire power as what the military has.  Being someone who doesn't think that our all volunteer military would ever take part in a nationwide suppression of the peoples will I don't really see the need for a well organized militia but that's just me and I'm certainly open to other opinions.

  • hukilaulau

    3/7/2008 8:11:55 AM |

    OK, I'm basically an anti-gun whiner, but I do love irony and humor, so I've got to admit I admire the creativity that went into the "Hello Kitty" rifle. I've enjoyed reading the entire thread, trying to research some of the more outrageous distortions on each side of the issue. Thanks for the fun!

  • MistyGreen

    3/7/2008 4:08:43 PM |

    I need to get me one of these!  I have pink camo to match!  Your wife is lucky!  I just can't believe it's real.  It looks so plastic.

  • peabody

    3/7/2008 5:48:26 PM |

    wurmz

  • bolapodre

    3/8/2008 9:34:03 PM |

    Wts the diference (for you) betwen a .380 bullet and a 5.56 when its inside your head?

  • Hunter

    3/9/2008 10:01:27 AM |

    I've been reading these bulletins for a while now, but finally I just had to chime in. David has made a beautiful piece, and with it, he's opened an incredible forum where people can voice their opinions, and show off their ignorances and intelligence.
    I don't really want to get into the gun control issue here (that's not the real reason David is sharing this with us), but the government will NEVER be able to get all guns off the street - legal or otherwise.
    I believe in legal gun ownership. I also know that if the government took my legal guns and said I couldn't have any, I would get more ILLEGALY, because someone will always have something.
    In recent years a police raid of a gang warehouse in Chicago turned up crates of US military M16's, rocket launchers and even a cluster bomb (an aircraft weapon with a killing radius larger than a football field). That's an extreme case, but it makes the point; If there is a demand, someone will create the supply.
    It's that simple.
    I personally believe that everyone should have the right to carry. Self-defense could itself become a great crime deterrent, but the choice should be ours to make.

    Just for the record, since the ban has been lifted, ALL available AR15s and M4s are legal in cali. Civilians can't buy the full auto versions, and if you have a Cali address you can't order the full-auto selector switch or reciever. This gun would be perfectly legal with the pistol grip, flash hider, adjustable stock, AND 30 round magazine. All stuff he said he can't have.

    But I do love the creative way he chose to prove his point.

    GUNS FOR GIRLS AND GLAMOUROUS WEAPONRY!!!!

    I was at a gun show just before my daughter was born, and I almost picked up "Babys 1st Bolt-action", a Davey Crickett .22 in glamourous pink for my little girl. Luckily, I happened upon the Crossbow that my wife wanted for christmas, so I got that instead. I'm still planning on getting my baby a rifle though, and teaching her from an early age. If she doesn't like the pink (we're trying to stay away from silly gender notions like that), then I'll just have the cutest gun ever in my own collection.
    Every guy should own one of these!:
    www.crickett.com/CrickettRifle/m225/m225.html

    Here's another one I happen to like:
    i45.photobucket.com/.../helloKittyAR.png
    Apparently hello kitty happens to be a going theme with custom built pink weapons.

    ...and according to national research, pink firearm sales are increasing exponentially. With stores across the country reporting that they actually have trouble keeping the pink pieces on hand. Though the biggest concern does seem to be the ability of pink firearms to look fake or like toys. But gun control and firearm safety begins at home. It's our responsibility as gun users to teach any novice users gun etiquette and common sense. The things that keep people from getting shot accidentally or through mistakes in judgement. As a child, I was allowed firearms, but not toy guns, because GUNS ARE NOT TOYS. That's what everyone should be taught, and what those crying foul over pink pieces have never learned.

    Remingtons pink guns have a unique challenge stamped on the stock: "Shoot like a girl - If you can!"

  • David

    3/9/2008 5:53:00 PM |

    Hunter,

    Just to avoid any misinformation I have to inform you that while the federal AW ban (the Clinton ban) did expire in 2004, California does have it's own state AW ban that is still in place.  You most certainly cannot build a "normal" AR in California, that is why this rifle has the strange looking grip on it as that does not meet the definition of a pistol grip.  This is also why you are limited to magazines of only 10 round capacity, unless you owned those magazines prior to 2000 and only then if on a rifle with zero of the banned features under SB23.

  • David

    3/9/2008 6:55:54 PM |

    Some of you may have noticed that the rifle has taken on a slightly different appearance lately.  Apparently there are a lot of people out there that just do not get parody and are completely misinformed as to the true meaning of this rifle.  Even though I have made it abundantly clear that this is a one of a kind rifle that is NOT for sale, the media, politians, and multi-million dollar companies just don't seem to have much of a sense of humor and strive to stifle free speech and freedom of expression.  Even an ignorant mayor of a major US city assumed this rifle is being mass produced and marketed to children.  It's much easier to just let you junior staffers and ignorant media feed you false information than to find out the truth for yourself.  I will have much more to blog about this whole situation real soon.  In the meantime I am going to close comments on this blog entry.  Hopefully it will be back open soon.  Thanks for all the interesting debate and comments and we will continue this later...

Loading